The purposeful one-sided rant makes the book lose all credibility, in particular since the arguments can easily be reversed – especially in the wake of Trump’s desperate challenge the US election outcome.
In the US election system, geographic concentration puts democrats at a fundamental disadvantage.
Compelling story telling and enriching perspectives make it hard not to become fascinated by Udham Singh and his quest for revenge.
The hypothetical scenarios are well crafted and unfortunately not as far-fetched as one might hope.
Good diagnosis of current monetary policy, but combined with a disappointingly naive belief in the free market as panacea.
Insightful perspective that highlights how few options political leaders actually have in responding to external threats.
Smart agent-based modelling perspective on global challenges around poverty and sustainability.
The book should be mainly read for the anecdotes on female astronauts and nerdy coast guards.
Next to revolution (in the spirit of Marx), the book claims there are just three other forces strong enough to achieve leveling: mass warfare, epidemics, and system collapse (the last of which is arguably overlaps with the others).
In choosing the personal perspective of the leader, makes the book prone to the narrative fallacy.
The author weaves the perspective of women, slaves, and other disadvantaged grouped into the narrative of US history, making the work part of a bigger movement.
Extensive justification of why Snowden exposed the scope of surveillance by the NSA (with too many references to patriotic US heros among Snowden’s ancestors).
The book would have been a better read if it had focused on one of its two narratives: the rise of algorithmic trading and the forays of hedge fund executives into US politics.
The author provides a richness of perspectives that guide the reader beyond clichés.
The author’s recommended retun to a local solidarity may address the issue at hand, but will also pose significant threats for ‘diversity and inclusion’.
Elaborate and fascinating analysis of Putin’s Russia, which bears striking parallels to what happens in Western countries, more recently.
the book, written pre-Trump, pre-Brexit and pre-Cambridge Analytics, underemphasizes the risk of large-scale orchestration of fringe groups to undermine nation states; thereby making the author’s call for stronger institutions feels a bit besides the point.
the set-up in which interesting historical facts serve to make a political argument makes the author prone to the narrative fallacy.